Without doubt, the single most important property of any radio network is coverage. Since coverage engineering may be the most complex area of the radio system specification and design process, it is a critical area where your time investment will be well justified. While it may seem sensible and understandable to simply have a goal of coverage that is “the same as or better than the existing network,” statements like this are hard to quantify, and can lead to misunderstandings and difficulties in testing and proving success.
Coverage goals that are ambiguous or unclear lead to ongoing frustration, project delays, and often unnecessary expense for both the customer and vendor. It’s critical to define coverage goals accurately so that system engineers can design, test, and verify that the new network is exactly what is wanted and needed. Properly-defined coverage goals sow the seeds for a successful project.
A properly-defined coverage goal must be:
For coverage engineers to effectively and efficiently design a radio system, the coverage goals must include answers to three critical questions:
You can define this as one (or more) of the following, which together describe what a user can reasonably expect:
This is the average reliability of communication within the service area.
This can be defined as either:
This free guide offers a best practice look at how to refine your answers to these questions to give you and your chosen vendor the best possible chance of completing a successful project. You’ll also find examples of properly worded coverage goals, reasons and examples of why poorly worded goals won’t work, and other important information to consider.
Download your free copy of Three Steps to Define Coverage Goals for a Successful Project here.